28 So. 3d 1 - Beverly v. Beverly’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Brewington · 960 So. 2d 678 - Quick v. Burton · 586 So. 2d 929 - Rudolph v. Rudolph · 896 So. 2d 557 - Sosebee v. Sosebee · 763 So. 2d 253 - Ex Parte Cohen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen, as in this case, 'oral testimony is considered by the trial court in reaching its judgment and that testimony is not present in the record as either a transcript or Rule 10(d), A[la]. R. A[pp]. P., statement, it must be conclusively presumed that the testimony [was] sufficient to support the judgment.'”
12 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. Davis · White v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.