28 So. 3d 388 - State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 845 So. 2d 1233 - State v. Landry · State v. Landry · State v. Floyd · State v. Walton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Defendant entered his guilty plea in the present case reserving his right to appeal the issue of whether the evidence against him was lawfully seized, and whether is [sic] would be admissible at trial, in addition to the issue of whether the court erred in dismissing his motions without a hearing. Because the trial court dismissed defendant's motions to suppress, it did not rule on the admissibility of the evidence. State v. Murphy, 28 So.3d at 390 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.