Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 So. 3d 985 - State v. KS

28 So. 3d 985 - State v. KS’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · Arizona v. Gant · Thornton v. United States · 986 So. 2d 625 - State v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “determination of historical facts enjoys a presumption of correctness and is subject to reversal only if not supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record. However, the circuit court's determinations on mixed questions of law and fact and its legal conclusions are subject to de novo review.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.