Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 SW3D 660 - Hernandez v. State

Hernandez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · North Carolina v. Pearce · Wainwright v. Witt · Brown v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he essential rule for determining whether different statutes proscribe the same offense so as to bar successive prosecution remains uncertain.... The only proposition upon which everyone seems to agree is that greater inclusive and lesser included offenses are the same for jeopardy purposes. But, determining whether two offenses stand- in such a relationship is still a controversial undertaking.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.