28 Tenn. App. 583 - Tyborowski v. Tyborowski’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1997
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 2 Smith & H. 530 - Brown v. Brown · Younger v. Gianotti · Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick · Brown v. Brown · Gettys v. Gettys
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A soldier can abandon his domicile of origin and select another, yet, in order to show a new domicile during the term of enlistment, there must be the clearest and most unequivocal proof.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““To give jurisdiction to the courts of this State in actions for divorce, one or both the parties must be domiciled in the State.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wiseman v. Wiseman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.