Cherry v. Speight’s Empirical Analysis
1866
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1926
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This judgment was given after Pruitt’s death, is against his administrator in the state of Mississippi, and, as it is not alleged that any assets which were in his hands have come into appellee’s possession, it cannot be made the foundation of an action to charge appellee as the personal representative of Pruitt in this state. Jones v. Jones, 15 Tex. 463 [ 65 Am. Dec. 174 ]; Stacy v. Thrasher, 6 How. 44 [ 12 L. Ed. 337 ]; McFearn [McLean] et al. v. Meek, 18 How. 44 [16]; Lightfoot [Brodie] v. Berkley [Bickley] 2 Rawle, 431 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reily v. Hare
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.