Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 U.S. 242 - Ann Shanks v. Abraham Dupont

Ann Shanks v. Abraham Dupont’s Empirical Analysis

28 U.S. 242 · 1830

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
15
cited 15 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 13 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions (15 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), Miller v. Albright (1998)

4 federal appellate · 13 district · 14 state decisions

12018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 2 Johns. Cas. 29 - Kelly v. Harrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * • Marriage with an alien, whether a friend or an enemy, produces no dissolution of the native allegiance of the wife. It may change her civil rights, but it does not affect her political rights or privileges. The general doctrine is that no persons can by any act of their own, without the consent of the government, put off their allegiance and become aliens. If it were otherwise, then a feme alien would by her marriage become, ipso facto, a citizen, and would be dowable of the estate of her husband, which is clearly contrary to law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “do not reach their political rights, nor prevent their acquiring or losing a national character. Those political rights do not stand upon the mere doctrines of municipal law, applicable to ordinary transactions, but stand upon the more general principles of the law of nations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.