Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 Va. App. 249 - Ford v. Commonwealth

28 Va. App. 249 - Ford v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Ornelas v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In assessing whether a detention is too long in duration to be justified as an investigative stop, we consider it appropriate to examine whether the police diligently pursued a means of investigation that was likely to confirm or dispel their suspicions quickly, during which time it was necessary to detain the Defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime, the witness’ degree of attention, the accuracy of the witness’ prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation and the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether a suspect is `in custody' under Miranda is determined by the circumstances of each case, and the ultimate inquiry is simply whether there is a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.