Cook v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 501 · 38 U.S.C. § 5103A · 38 U.S.C. § 5104 · 38 U.S.C. § 7104 · 38 U.S.C. § 7107 · 38 U.S.C. § 7112 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7261
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · United States v. Mead Corp. · Christensen v. Harris County · Brown v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). Because the Veterans Court did not err in concluding that Cook was entitled to an opportunity for a further Board hearing, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND In the Veterans' Judicial Review Act, Congress codified a veteran's longstanding right to a Board hearing. Under the provision at issue, "[t]he Board shall decide any appeal only after affording the appellant an opportunity for a hearing .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cook v. Wilkie“it suggests that the Board must provide a hearing each or any time an appeal is before it for a decision,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cook v. Wilkie“A hearing on appeal will be granted if an appellant ... expresses a desire to appear in person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cook v. Wilkie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.