Dane v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis
1902
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably Pettis v. Johnston (1920), John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Gooley (1938)
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Peterson v. Dillon · Powell v. Nolan · Hanson v. Wolcott · People v. Mullan · Dane v. Daniel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not shown that any one has obtained rights or interests by reason of any act or neglect on her (plaintiff’s) part, but the subject-matter in litigation is in the same condition with respect to all parties before the court as it was when she commenced this action. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. West v. Commissioner““It is universally conceded that a judgment void for want of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant may be vacated on motion, irrespective of the lapse of time.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nevers v. Cochrane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.