28 Wash. App. 128 - State v. Dorosky’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2014
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 92 Wash. 2d 209 - State v. Scott · 81 Wash. 2d 541 - Reeploeg v. Jensen · 89 Wash. 2d 824 - In Re the Welfare of Lowe · 68 Wash. 2d 756 - Marie's Blue Cheese Dressing, Inc. v. Andre's Better Foods, Inc. · 22 Wash. App. 822 - In Re the Welfare of Gakin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the offenses were committed through a single act or omission, omission, or through an act or omission which in itself constituted one of the offenses and also was an element of the other, the aggregate of all the terms shall not exceed one hundred fifty percent of the term imposed for the most serious offense;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Contreras“By their definitions, the crimes of second degree burglary and first degree theft cannot be committed through a single act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Contreras
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.