Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 WIS2D 575 - Frye v. Angst

Frye v. Angst’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
5
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

2 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2008 · most notably Saphir v. Neustadt (1979), 137 Wis. 2d 109 - Gonzalez Ex Rel. Bichler v. City of Franklin (1987)

2 district · 29 state decisions

10019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morgan v. Hunt · Bergstein v. Popkin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Accident insurance, liability of insurer. Any bond or policy of insurance covering liability to others by reason of the operation of a motor vehicle shall be deemed and construed to contain the following conditions: That the insurer shall be liable to the persons entitled to recover for the death of any person, or for injury to person or property, irrespective of whether such liability be in praesenti or contingent and to become fixed or certain by final judgment against the insured, when caused by the negligent operation, maintenance, use or defective construction of the vehicle described therein, such liability is not to exceed the amount named in said bond or policy.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[m]aintenance' of an automobile has never been considered a part of operation, or of management and control,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Sec. 204.30 (4), Stats., provides for the direct liability of the insured to the injured party when the conditions of that section are met. Sec. 260.11 (1) is a procedural statute to allow direct action by the injured party against the insurer when the conditions of that section are met.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.