Finley v. Pew’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2003
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kohler v. Agassiz · Hathaway v. Davis · Harding v. Larkin · Hale Bros. v. Milliken · Page v. People ex rel. Weber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The only material changes in the amended petition are (1) that the amounts due under the original contract are set out separately from.the remainder of the money due, and (2) plaintiff attempts to set out an express contract or agreement for and in connection with the extra labor, material and money furnished, instead of an implied contract stated or attempted to be stated in the original petition. Such changes are clearly within the purview of our statute allowing amendments. ’ ’ Finley v. Pew, 28 Wyo. 356 , 205 Pac. 310, 315 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. King v. Giblin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.