¶1Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. Regardless of whether plaintiff would be estopped by the Nevada decree in the absence of a separation judgment later obtained by the defendant in New York *914State, the fact is that such later separation judgment was obtained by him in New York State, and in view thereof, no estoppel did exist in New York State. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ.
280 A.D. 913
Young v. Young
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 7, 1952
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1952-10-07
Decided 1952-10-07