Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 Ala. 406 - Knowles v. State

Knowles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 1995 · most notably State v. Delano (1968), 542 So. 2d 931 - Ex Parte Heaton (1989)

47 state decisions

1601967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on David Busby v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby Prison · Grant Cooper v. William C. Holman, Warden · Queor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * ‡ * It is settled by a host of authorities that a.judgment on a plea of guilty which has been entered voluntarily on advice of counsel is not rendered invalid because the defendant had previously made a confession under circumstances which might have rendered it inadmissible in evidence if the defendant had pleaded not guilty and had gone to trial. This is so, because the plea, if voluntarily and understandingly made, is conclusive as to the defendant’s guilt, admitting all the facts charged and waiving all nonjurisdictional defects in the prior proceedings against him. The judgment and sentence which follow a plea of guilty are based solely upon the plea and not upon any evidence which may have been acquired improperly by the prosecutor.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.