Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

280 F. 238

Docket Nos. 160, 161.

The Oregon

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1922.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1922-01-26

<p>Appeals from tlie District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.</p> <p>Libels by the International Nickle Company against the ferryboat Oregon, the Brooklyn & Manhattan, Derry' Company, claimant, and by the Bro’oklyn & Manhattan Ferry Company against the steam lighter Frank Coe, the International Nickle Company, claimant. From a decree (280 Fed. 235) the last-named claimant appeals. Affirmed.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on The Oregon

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1922-01-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1961

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

4019221930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeals from tlie District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2Libels by the International Nickle Company against the ferryboat Oregon, the Brooklyn & Manhattan, Derry' Company, claimant, and by the Bro’oklyn & Manhattan Ferry Company against the steam lighter Frank Coe, the International Nickle Company, claimant. From a decree (280 Fed. 235) the last-named claimant appeals. Affirmed.

¶3Macklin, Brown, Purdy & Van Wyck, of New York City (Pierre M. Brown,, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

¶4Harrington, Bigham & Eng'lar, of New York City (Vine H’. Smith, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

¶5Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7Decree affirmed, with interest and costs.

/280/f1d/238 · .json · Public domain