Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 F.1d 715 - In re Bernard

In re Bernard’s Empirical Analysis

280 F. 715 · 1922

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2017

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

401922193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “what shall be the effect of discharge is a function of the court in which any given claim or debt or demand is advanced, and not of the bankruptcy court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.