¶1Bankruptcy <@=>81 (I) — ■Petition against partnership for insolvency must allege insufficiency of firm and individual assets to pay firm debts.
¶2A petition praying that a partnership, but not its members, he adjudged a bankrupt because of the insolvency of the firm, which does not allege either that the members of the partnership are insolvent or that firm assets, combined with the assets of the members in excess of their individual debts, are insufficient to pay the partnership debts, must be dismissed.
¶3In Bankruptcy. Involuntary petition against William W. Griffith and another, trading as Griffith & Son. On motion to dismiss the petition.
¶4Motion sustairfed, unless the defects in the petition are cured by amendment.
¶5Charles W. Cullen, of Georgetown, Del., and Wilbur L,. Adams, of Wilmington, Del., for petitioning creditors.
¶6Caleb S. Layton, of Wilmington, Del., and Daniel J. Layton, of Georgetown, Del., for alleged bankrupts.
¶8An involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed, praying that Griffith and Son, a partnership, but not its members, be adjudged bankrupt. The act of bankruptcy charged is founded upon insolvency. The partnership has moved that the petition be dismissed upon the ground that it is not therein alleged, either that the members of the partnership are insolvent or that the assets of the firm combined with the assets of the members in excess of their individual debts, are insufficient to pay the partnership debts. The motion to dismiss must be sustained, upon the authority of Francis v. McNeal, 228 U. S. 695, 33 Sup. Ct. 701, 57 L. Ed. 1029, L. R. A. 1915E, 706, *879and 186 Fed. 481, 108 C. C. A. 459, and Vaccaro v. Security Bank of Memphis, 103 Fed. 436, 442, unless the defects in the petition be cured by amendment within 15 days after the date hereof. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Atlanta & W. P. R. Co., 238 Fed. 36, 151 C. C. A. 112; General Order in Bankruptcy No. 37 (89 Fed. xiv, 32 C. C. A. xiv).