In re Schenectady Varnish Co.’s Empirical Analysis
280 F.2d 169 · 1960
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 1988
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1052 (§ 2 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on In re Swift & Co. · Application of Hillerich & Bradsby Co · Application of E. J. Brach & Sons · Marcalus Manufacturing Co. v. Watson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fill in the attached questionnaire, without prompting”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.