Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 F.2d 35 - Doherty v. United States

Doherty v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

280 F.2d 35 · 1960

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
July 1973
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4161

Relies on Zerbst v. Kidwell · Anderson v. Corall · United States ex rel. Rowe v. Nicholson · Van Buskirk v. Wilkinson · United States ex rel. Nicholson v. Dillard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The time begins to run only after a warrant has issued for the retaking of the prisoner and ‘he is returned to the custody of the Attorney General under said warrant * * * ’ His return to ‘custody’ does not determine whether he shall be required to serve out his sentence but only when that service shall begin. Consequently the term ‘custody’ can only refer to the immediate physical control of the prisoner, regardless of whether his parole violation has temporarily made him inaccessible to the Attorney General’s power by warrant to apprehend and reincarcerate him.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.