Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

280 F.2d 425

Docket No. 14045.

Mack v. Ohio

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-06-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1960

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1960-06-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Richard E. Brown, Norwood, Ohio, (appointed by the court) for appellant.

Mark McElroy, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Wm. M. Vance, and Aubrey Wendt, Asst. Attys. Gen. of Ohio, for appellees.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MILLER and CECIL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

¶2

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be and is hereby affirmed in accordance with the order of Judge Underwood.

/280/f2d/425 · .json · Public domain