Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

280 F.2d 641

Docket No. 15436.

Steptoe v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued June 23, 1960.

Decided July 7, 1960.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-07-07

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1961

3 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Blunt v. United States · Ramsour v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1960-07-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Albert F. Adams, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), for appellant.

¶2Mr. Donald S. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Before Edgerton, Washington, and Bastían, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant contends and appellee does not question that this appeal from denial of a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate a sentence for robbery should be treated as a direct appeal from the conviction, on the basis that notice of appeal was timely filed and subsequent delay was due to excusable neglect. We assume, without deciding, that this is correct. Cf. Blunt v. United States, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 266, 244 F.2d 355; Ramsour v. United States, 108 U.S.App.D.C. -, 280 F.2d 57. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

¶6Affirmed.

/280/f2d/641 · .json · Public domain