Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 F.2d 89 - Steele v. United States

Steele v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

280 F.2d 89 · 1960

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably Psaty v. United States (1971), Spivak v. United States (1967)

22 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

1601960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flora v. United States · Flora v. United States · 172 F. Supp. 793 - Steele v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “legally entitled to make payment of the penalty applicable to the withheld taxes of any individual employee, to make claim for refund, and to institute suit for recovery, as a means of settling the question of the right of the government to have made penalty assessment against them in the circumstances of the situation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.