Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 F.3d 741 - Muick v. Glenayre Electronics

Muick v. Glenayre Electronics’s Empirical Analysis

280 F.3d 741 · 2002

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
5
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on O'CONNOR v. Ortega · Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko · Sheppard v. Beerman · 126 Ill. 2d 411 - Lovgren v. Citizens First National Bank · United States v. Taketa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “But Glenayre had announced that it could inspect the laptops that it furnished for the use of its employees, and this destroyed any reasonable expectation of privacy that Muick might have had and so scotches his claim.”); United States v. Simons, 206 F.3d 392, 398 (4th Cir.2000) (”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.