Mason v. Sybinski’s Empirical Analysis
280 F.3d 788 · 2002
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 407 (§ 207 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board · Brokaw v. Mercer County · Bennett v. Arkansas · Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Thomas C. Fulkerson and Dolly S. Fulkerson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress allowed state hospitals to act as representative payees when certain safeguards were met,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“outside the ambit of the anti-attachment provision”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gean v. Hattaway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.