United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
280 F.3d 807 · 2002
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2021
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Hickok · United States of America v. Guy J. Westmoreland · United States v. Galbraith · United States v. Johnson · United States v. Barnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no direct proof' that he was at the residence because Lisa Templln only relayed what her roommate told her happened and did not see Martin herself. "[T]he Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply at sentencing hearings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“which can virtually never be clear error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.