Cedar Rapids Cellular Telephone, L.P. v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
280 F.3d 874 · 2002
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Spargo v. New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct (2003), Aaron v. Target Corp. (2004)
12 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the parties in federal and state court need not be identical where the interests of the parties seeking relief in federal court are closely related to those of [the] parties in pending state proceedings and where the federal action seeks to interfere with pending state proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The State of Iowa has an important interest in enforcing its consumer protection statutes.”); Am. Consumer Publ'g Ass'n v. Margosian, 349 F.3d 1122 , 1127 (9th Cir.2003) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.