Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 F.3d 883 - Kopp v. A Kopp

Kopp v. A Kopp’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably GreatAmerica Leasing Corp. v. Rohr-Tippe Motors, Inc. (2005), 317 F. Supp. 2d 935 - Adams v. Bank of America, N.A. (2004)

8 district ·

140200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · United States v. Morrison · Burnett v. Griffith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he district court has subject matter jurisdiction in a diversity case when a fact finder could legally conclude, from the pleadings and proof adduced to the court before trial, that the damages that the plaintiff suffered are greater than $75,000.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “appear[s] to a legal certainty that the claim is really for less than the jurisdictional amount.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “legal certainty” standard announced in Larkin v. Brown, 41 F.3d 387 (8th Cir.1994) (citing St. Paul Mercury Indem. Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283 , 58 S.Ct. 586 , 82 L.Ed. 845 (1938)) with the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.