Brody’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
8 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably In Re Vantive Corporation Securities Litigation (2002), 406 F. Supp. 2d 433 - In Re Alstom SA Securities Litigation (2005)
8 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Chiarella v. United States · Superintendent of Insurance of State of New York v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. · Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o matter how detailed and accurate disclosure statements are, there are likely to be additional details that could have been disclosed but were not.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“prohibit[s] only misleading and untrue statements, not statements that are incomplete.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the press release had affirmatively intimated that no merger was imminent, it may well have been misleading. The actual press release, however, neither stated nor implied anything regarding a merger.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.