280 F. App'x 20 - Rivers v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration · Carroll v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Snell v. Apfel · Green-Younger v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“required to credit [plaintiff’s] testimony about the severity of [his] pain and the functional limitations it caused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Calzada v. ASTURE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.