Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

280 F. App'x 285

In re Gadd

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 28, 2008

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-05-28

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Decided 2008-05-28

PER CURIAM:

¶1William Sanford Gadd petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2PETITION DENIED.

/280/fappx/285 · .json · Public domain