¶1 Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Michael Wayne Parrish raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir.2005), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
280 F. App'x 387
United States v. Parrish
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided June 4, 2008
This page is marked noindex.
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-06-04
Relies on United States v. Hinson
Decided 2008-06-04