Marklin v. Drew Properties Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2016
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Waterman-Bic Pen Corp. v. L. E. Waterman Pen Co. · 45 Misc. 2d 594 - Cocoline Chocolate Co. v. Hillside Enterprises, Inc. · Bard-Parker Co. v. Dictograph Products Co. · Zeiberg v. Robosonics, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the law of New York it is settled that: ‘ * * * the court should not attempt to decide in advance the merits of the controversy by vacating the attachment unless the complaint and affidavits clearly indicate that the plaintiff must ultimately fail.’ ” (emphasis in original)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.