Landry v. Daley’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably United States v. Dellinger (1972), 1 Cal. 3d 930 - In Re Kay (1970)
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cox v. State of Louisiana · Dennis v. United States · Terminiello v. Chicago · Whitney v. People of State of California · Edwards v. South Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Political campaigns, athletic events, public meetings and a host of other activities produce loud, confused or senseless shouting not in accord with fact, truth or right procedure to say nothing of not in accord with propriety, modesty, good taste or good manners. The happy cacophony of democracy would be stilled if all ‘improper noises’ in the normal meaning of the term was suppressed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The time has come for the City of Chicago to adopt a modern ordinance which will enable it to discharge its responsibility for maintaining the peace while at the same time protecting its citizens in the enjoyment of their constitutional rights.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Nothing said here is intended to hold or imply that making or aiding or assisting to cause a riot may not be proscribed even though the actions taken consist merely in the exercise of First Amendment freedoms if the words spoken or loritten or the actions taken under the circumstances constitute a “clear and present danger" that a riot will result and the requisite intent to cause a riot is present.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.