Ginwright v. Exeter Finance Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 47 U.S.C. § 227
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“You agree that we may try to contact you in writing, by e-mail, or using prerecorded/artificial voice messages, text messages, and automatic telephone dialing systems, as the law allows. " (Doc. No. 25-4.) (emphasis added). There is no dispute that the "law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[ Reyes '] prohibition on later revocation of consent arising from a boilerplate consent provision, however, would be inconsistent with the FCC's ruling that a consumer has”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A]dopt[ing] the prohibition on revocation in Reyes [ ] would result in the effective circumvention of the TCPA in the debtor-creditor context.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.