Synopsys, Inc. v. Matal’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 35 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980) · 35 U.S.C. § 302 (§ 1 of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980) · 35 U.S.C. § 303 (§ 1 of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980) · 35 U.S.C. § 304 (§ 1 of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980) · 35 U.S.C. § 305 (§ 1 of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980) · 35 U.S.C. § 306 (§ 1 of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980) · 35 U.S.C. § 315
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Bennett v. Spear · United States v. Turkette · United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Brown v. General Services Administration
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“attempt to use artful pleading to circumvent”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.