Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 Ga. 268 - Wiggins v. State

Wiggins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Selvester v. United States · 243 Ga. App. 868 - Dennard v. State · Tooke v. State · Morrill v. State · 272 Ga. App. 414 - Wiggins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before an indictment against a present or former peace officer charging the officer with a crime which is alleged to have occurred while he or she was in the performance of his or her duties is returned by a grand jury, the officer shall be notified of the contemplated action by the district attorney of the county wherein the grand jury shall convene and the officer shall be afforded the rights provided in Code Section 45-11-4.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The rights afforded an officer by OCGA § 45-[11]-4 include the right to be present with counsel during the state's presentation of evidence to the grand jury and, at the conclusion of the state's evidence, the right to make a statement without being subject to direct or cross-examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when an indictment contains multiple counts, it “really charges a number of distinct and separate transactions, [and] it becomes the duty of the trial court to conduct the case, and of the appellate court to review it, just as if it were a consolidation of separate indictments.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.