Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 Ga. 292 - Patel v. Patel

Patel v. Patel’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Huggins v. Huggins · Astin v. Carden · Irwin v. Willis · Byelick v. Michel Herbelin USA, Inc. · Rogers v. McDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When any fund or property is in litigation and the rights of either or both parties cannot otherwise be fully protected or when there is a fund or property having no one to manage it, a receiver of the same may be appointed by the judge of the superior court having jurisdiction thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.