Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 Ga. App. 457 - Walker v. State

280 Ga. App. 457 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Brodes v. State · Fortson v. State · 248 Ga. App. 18 - Gunsby v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “That some evidence offered by a witness seems contradictory to his own or to some other’s, or incomplete or uncertain, does not automatically discredit the evidence given by that witness for it is the function of the trier [ ] of fact to determine to what evidence it gives credence. It is not for us to determine or question how the jury resolved any apparent conflicts or uncertainties in the evidence. Rather, on appeal, we indulge every contingency in favor of the verdict. 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]e view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility, but only determine if the evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.