Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 Ga. App. 586 - State v. Giddens

280 Ga. App. 586 - State v. Giddens’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · Strunk v. United States · In re Draffin · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the accused has a right to a speedy trial in a criminal prosecution. The test for determining whether that right has been violated is set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U. S. 514 (92 SC 2182, 33 LE2d 101) (1972), which provides that four factors are taken into consideration: length of the delay; reason for the delay; defendant’s assertion of the right to a speedy trial; and prejudice to the defense. Boseman v. State, 263 Ga. 730, 731 ( 438 SE2d 626 ) (1994). None of the factors are regarded as necessary or sufficient to finding deprivation of the right to a speedy trial, but rather “the factors should be considered together in a balancing test of the conduct of the prosecution and the defendant.” (Citation omitted.) Id. On appeal, “(t)he question is whether the trial court abused its discretion in ruling that [defendant’s] speedy-trial rights were violated.” State v. Redding, 274 Ga. 831, 832 ( 561 SE2d 79 ) (2002).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.