Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 Ga. App. 894 - Moore v. State

280 Ga. App. 894 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thaxton v. State · Butts v. State · Braithwaite v. State · Burgess v. State · Lucas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The superior court overruled the hearsay objection, because the persons who had made the out-of-court statements were witnesses in the case who remained available for cross-examination. On appeal, [Colzie] argues that the [detective’s] testimony improperly bolstered the credibility of the witnesses who made the out-of-court statements. [Cit.] . . . [H]owever, . . . where a party objects to evidence only on grounds of hearsay, an objection on the ground of improper bolstering has been waived. [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.