Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 KAN 266 - In re Robertson

In re Robertson’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2022

10 state decisions

40200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Jones · State Ex Rel. Commission on Judicial Qualifications v. Rome · In re Yandell · In Re Platt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.