¶1concurring: I concur in the result reached by the court and in the majority of its rationale. I believe the record amply demonstrates Moses failed to meet his burden of demonstrating manifest injustice justifying withdrawal of his guilty plea. I write separately only to emphasize that I would not rely on laches or any “laches-like” arguments to reach the outcome in this case.
280 Kan. 939
State v. Moses
Decided February 3, 2006
Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 2006-02-03
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“would not rely on laches or any `laches-like' arguments to reach the outcome in this case.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 40 Kan. App. 2d 182 - In Re Plb
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-02-03
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably State v. Stevens (2007), State v. Miller (2007)
2 district · 44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →