Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 MASS 170 - Check v. Kaplan

Check v. Kaplan’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Coggins v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc. (1986), Foreign Auto Import, Inc. v. Renault Northeast, Inc. (1975)

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 51 state decisions

150193219401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rocca v. Thompson · City of New York v. New York Telephone Co. · Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal. · Merrimac Chemical Co. v. Moore · Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the act by which a third party demands to be received as a party in a suit pending between other persons. The intervention is made for the pu rpose of being joined to the plaintiff, and to claim the same thing he does, or some other thing connected with it; or to join the defendant, and with him to oppose the claim of the plaintiff, which it is his interest to defeat. ... A stranger to a proceeding can have no interest, in a legal sense, in the claim asserted in a personal action unless he is a necessary party, in order adequately to enforce or to contest such claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]s between the parties a right in the nature of a lien on an identified and particular fund may be created [by express agreement] which will in appropriate circumstances by enforced in equity”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a pure question of fact upon which the decision of the trial judge must stand”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.