Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 N.C. 74 - State v. Hudson

State v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably State v. Ashe (1985), State v. Bindyke (1975)

83 state decisions

28019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gammons · State v. Mabry · 41 Ala. App. 548 - Huggins v. State · State v. . Alexander · State v. . Camby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Intent is an attitude or emotion of the mind and is seldom, if ever, susceptible of proof by direct evidence, it must ordinarily be proven by circumstantial evidence, i.e., by facts and circumstances from which it may be inferred.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[n]o person shall be convicted of any crime but by the unanimous verdict of a jury in open court,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether he desisted for that reason, ... or because he did not intend to have intercourse with her by force, was a matter for the jury alone, and was properly left to them in connection with all the other evidence in the case. [Citations omitted.] It is true, he desisted, that is to say, he did not sue ceed in having sexual intercourse with the girl. . . . But his failure is not conclusive of the absence of intent ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.