Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

280 N.W.2d 393

State v. Hildebrand

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 27, 1979

Supreme Court of Iowa · decided 1979-06-27

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-06-27

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Sullivan v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. (1982), State v. Liddell (2003)

46 state decisions

22019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

McGIVERIN, Justice

¶1(concurring specially).

¶2I concur in the opinion, but feel compelled to write further.

¶3The opinion states the accident is not unimportant or irrelevant as an attending circumstance in sentencing. With that I agree, but the statement does not go far enough.

¶4I believe an accident in which an OMVUI defendant is at fault and which results at least in part from defendant’s driving while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage can be a very important factor, although not the only factor, in consideration of a proper sentence for the individual defendant. Our OMVUI law was enacted to protect persons using the highways from accidents caused by drinking drivers.

¶5I would not want trial courts to be deterred by the result we reach today from giving appropriate weight to occurrence of an accident and its attendant circumstances when considering a sentence.

/280/nw2d/393 · .json · Public domain