State v. Hanson’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“from the victim's mother rather than being the 'kind of expert vouching testimony' that most often has prompted us to conclude that the trial court plainly should have stricken the testimony sua sponte ,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“plausible that defendant may have concluded that there was little to gain by objecting to the testimony, and that defendant had a strategic reason not to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not directly related to the victim's allegations of sexual abuse, but, instead, was aimed at a collateral issue”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.