Phillips v. Premo’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[w]e review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. State v. Ferraro , 264 Or. App. 271 , 280, 331 P.3d 1086 (2014). A court errs if it 'fails to exercise discretion, refuses to exercise discretion or fails to make a record which reflects an exercise of discretion.' State v.Mayfield , 302 Or. 631 , 645, 733 P.2d 438 (1987) ; State v. Romero , 236 Or. App. 640 , 643-44, 237 P.3d 894 (2010)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] trial court cannot deny a motion for a continuance simply because the motion is made on the day of trial; whether a court may deny such a motion depends upon the particular circumstances of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to present evidence that the witnesses would have been available to testify at the trial and sentencing and that their testimony would have had a tendency to affect the results of those proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.