Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 ORAPP 634 - Phillips v. Premo

Phillips v. Premo’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[w]e review the denial of a motion for a continuance for abuse of discretion. State v. Ferraro , 264 Or. App. 271 , 280, 331 P.3d 1086 (2014). A court errs if it 'fails to exercise discretion, refuses to exercise discretion or fails to make a record which reflects an exercise of discretion.' State v.Mayfield , 302 Or. 631 , 645, 733 P.2d 438 (1987) ; State v. Romero , 236 Or. App. 640 , 643-44, 237 P.3d 894 (2010)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] trial court cannot deny a motion for a continuance simply because the motion is made on the day of trial; whether a court may deny such a motion depends upon the particular circumstances of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to present evidence that the witnesses would have been available to testify at the trial and sentencing and that their testimony would have had a tendency to affect the results of those proceedings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.