Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 P.3d 366 - State v. Albert

State v. Albert’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re C. G. · Widick v. State · State v. Walker · City of Edmond v. Wakefield · Bailey v. Gniech

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a. the parent has failed to correct the condition which led to the deprived adjudication of the child, and b. the parent has been given at least three (3) months to correct the condition....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “absent identification of the condi tion(s) the parent failed to correct in both the jury instructions and the termination order the appellate courts are 'effectively precluded from determining if the trial court acted properly in terminating Appellant's parental rights,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The State did not seek certiorari review in either case. ¶4 In the R.A. case, the Court of Civil Appeals noted that the trial court terminated mother's parental rights for failure to correct her substance abuse problem, when the evidence showed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.