Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 So. 2d 673 - State v. Johnson

280 So. 2d 673 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 1991

16 state decisions

90197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 164 So. 2d 817 - Roberts v. State · McKenna v. People · United States v. Williams · 249 So. 2d 470 - Sher v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. · Belger v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Thus, in Roberts , unlike the instant case, no question of defendant's right of confrontation was raised. Defendant simply objected to the failure of the state to offer a test bullet into evidence. He did not argue and it does not appear that he was deprived of an opportunity to have the bullet examined by his own expert... ."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “appellant's right to examine tangible evidence is a part of his right to the confrontation of witnesses against him and the right to a full and complete cross-examination of the witnesses who are to be presented against him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"The state may not by the simple statement that they have `lost the physical evidence' prevent the exercise of [an important procedural right] and then use the [evidence] against the defendant."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.